iZombie, Seasons 1-3: Part One of the “Catching Up on iZombie” Miniseries (MAJOR SPOILERS)

CPU! final-01

A new podcast episode of Couch Potatoes Unite!, which is based on a blog of the same name hosted at couchpotatoesunite.wordpress.com. In this episode, recorded in June 2018, our panel of CPU! veterans and all-around brainy chicks – moderator Kylie, Kristen, Jen S., and Jenn K. – convenes for the first time around the CPU! Water Cooler to discuss the first three seasons of a quirky comedy-drama adding to the extensive annals of zombie fiction, i.e. iZombie, in this, Part One of our two-part “Catching Up on iZombie” Miniseries.  As always, if you have not watched any of iZombie, be aware that there are, most definitely, MAJOR SPOILERS! Tell us what you think in the comments below and check out the blog and YouTube for other TV related discussions, in both podcast and blog format. Also, if there are other shows you’re interested in the blog covering, sound off below! Tell us what you like or don’t like. Keep the discussion going!

Editor: Kylie C. Piette
Logo: Rebecca Wallace
Marketing Graphic Artist: Krista Pennington

Advertisements

PODCAST! – Pilots, Premieres, and First Looks: “iZombie” – Recapping Seasons 1, 2, and 3; Part One of CPU!’s “Catching Up on iZombie” Miniseries (MAJOR SPOILERS)

Image may contain: text

Moderator: Chief Couch Potato Kylie

THE SPECS:

Who: “iZombie” is a horror, crime/procedural, comedy-drama series that airs on the CW, typically during the spring.

What:  “iZombie,” developed by Rob Thomas and Diane Ruggiero-Wright, is a loose adaptation of the comic book series of the same name created by Chris Roberson and Michael Allred and published by DC Comics under their Vertigo imprint.

When: Season One aired from March 14, 2015, to June 9, 2015, with a total of 13 episodes; Season Two aired from October 6, 2015, to April 12, 2016, with a total of 19 episodes; and Season Three aired from April 4, 2017, to June 27, 2017, with a total of 13 episodes, all on the CW.  

Where: The action is set primarily in Seattle, Washington – present day.

Why: To find out why individual podcast panelists started watching this show, listen to the podcast episode via the link below!

During the annual Fall TV Preview for the 2014-2015 season, CPU! Chief Kylie picked up this show for CPU!’s review.  When I picked it up, I said:

Okay, the name of the show is on the level of ridiculously stupid, and the rash of zombie-related fare is as overdone as vampires (though I enjoy vampires so much more than zombies). Also, this could cross heavily into procedural territory.  Yet, there is an interesting twist wherein the main character absorbs memories from brains she eats.  I have a feeling it might be better than the name lets on…then again…

How – as in How Was It?

The pilot/premiere rating scale:

***** – I HAVE TO WATCH EVERYTHING. HOLY SMOKES!

**** – Well, it certainly seems intriguing. I’m going to keep watching, but I see possible pitfalls in the premise.

*** – I will give it six episodes and see what happens. There are things I like, and things I don’t. We’ll see which “things” are allowed to flourish.

** – I will give it three episodes. Chances are, I’m mainly bored, but there is some intrigue or fascination that could hold it together. No matter how unlikely.

* – Pass on this one, guys. It’s a snoozer/not funny/not interesting/not my cup of tea… there are too many options to waste time on this one.

iZombie = 4.2, by average of the podcast panel.

SYNOPSIS

Seattle medical resident Olivia “Liv” Moore (Rose McIver) is turned into a zombie while attending a boat party. She abandons her career and breaks up with her fiance, much to the disappointment and puzzlement of her family. She discovers that if she does not periodically satisfy her new appetite for brains, she starts turning into a stereotypical zombie, stupid and homicidal. Instead of feeding by killing innocent people, Liv decides to take a job at the King County morgue and to eat the brains of the corpses she autopsies. Her secret is guessed by her boss, Dr. Ravi Chakrabarti (Rahul Kohli). Ravi soon becomes Liv’s friend and confidant, and as a scientist, he is intrigued by her condition.

Liv finds out that whenever she eats a dead person’s brain, she temporarily inherits some of their personality traits and skills, and she experiences flashbacks of that person’s life. Those visions are generally triggered by sights (events or objects) or sounds (repeated sentences). In the case of murder victims, the flashbacks offer clues about the killer. Liv decides to use this new ability to help Police Detective Clive Babineaux (Malcolm Goodwin) solve crimes. Though she initially passes herself off as a psychic, Clive eventually learns the truth about her and zombies. Meanwhile, Ravi works to develop a cure for Liv’s affliction in the hope that one day she will be able to resume her former life.

THOUGHTS

A group of brave and brainy CPU! regular panelists were ready to get scratched and slightly gourmet to discuss another comic book adaptation with a decidedly cult following hanging out rather comfortably with several other comic book adaptations over on the CW network. Specifically, regular CPU! panelists Kristen, the reigning panel champ; vampire, supernatural, and SHIELD enthusiast Jen (going by Jen S. in this episode); and Original though Not Unfortunate, if she gives you 13 Reasons Why, panelist Jenn (going by Jenn K. in this episode), gathered “Around the Water Cooler” to take a “First Look” at the first three seasons of iZombie. The panelists examine Liv’s initial foray into life as a member of the undead, Ravi’s discovery of her secret and work on a potential cure, and the friends and foes of the first season; to Major Lilywhite (Robert Buckley), Liv’s on/off again fiance and boyfriend (and zombie), taking on the persona of “Chaos Killer;” and to all-zombie military contractor Fillmore Graves and the advent of zombie discrimination, as the Seattle population of zombies increases and becomes known to the decidedly disturbed non-zombie population of the Emerald City.

Ultimately, our CPU! faithful group of panelists thinks that iZombie is a unique, quirky, and fresh comedy-drama addition to the annals of burgeoning zombie fiction, even if it is nothing like fare in the vein of The Walking Dead.  In this episode, the first of a catch-up miniseries in which we chat about this show, our panel reflects on and recaps the first three seasons of iZombie, reacting to the various quirky characters and the seemingly impossible situations in which they find themselves, including Liv’s ingestion of “brains of the week,” which produces a decidedly procedural format underlying this program, albeit with a very specific twist.

This episode was recorded in June 2018, and there are, without question, MAJOR SPOILERS, as the panelists cover key plot points of the first three seasons. Listen at your own risk, and let us know what you think by commenting below!

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter (@cpupodcast), Instagram (@couchpotatoesunite), Pinterest (@cpupodcast), or email us at couchpotatoesunitepodcast@gmail.com – or subscribe to this blog, the YouTube channel, our iTunes channel, our Stitcher Radio channel , and/or find us on Google Play to keep track of brand new episodes.  In the meantime, let us know what you think!  Comment or review us in any of the above forums – we’d love your feedback!

Remember, new episodes and blog posts are published weekly!  Next Wednesday, we offer the second of our two-part iZombie miniseries, in which we will recap Season 4, which will render CPU! officially caught up to the current season.  Stay tuned!

RECOMMENDATION
iZombie is recommended overall by our CPU! panel to fans of zombie fiction with some crossover appeal who are not afraid to laugh, keeping in mind properties like Shaun of the Dead; to fans of genre fare like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which readily exploit nerd-core and offer pop culture winks and nods in happy ways; and to procedural TV with a twist, such as Bones, especially those that offer a heaping dose of dark comedy.  One panelist cautioned that if a zombie enthusiast is not willing to laugh at their beloved zombies in question, this show would likely not appeal to said enthusiast, particularly if said zombie fan remains purist to zombie fiction’s general horror roots.  Chief CP Kylie also compared the humor of Arrested Development to that of this show, in that iZombie is laden with innuendo and meta references and is self-aware without taking itself too seriously, which renders the show all the more charming   Further, the panel generally praises the performances of the main cast, particularly McIver, with her different affects signifying zombie brains of the week, and Kohli (Ravi is, unanimously, the panel’s favorite character) as well as the generally inventive writing, though the panel also agrees that there are better seasons than others.  In fact, the panelists describe the show as generally “solid” with a noted lull in the third season when the writers aimed for something more topical to current events, in on-the-nose allegory, rather than steering the story in a direction that flowed better within the world that had been organically established and developed up until that point.  In any event, our panel universally had and has great fun watching this series and believes that most with an open and slightly nerdy sense of humor will have fun watching it too.
THE FUTURE OF THE SHOW
The CW renewed iZombie for a fifth and final season, which is expected to premiere in spring 2019 (no tentative premiere date has yet been announced). CPU! will next visit iZombie next week for Part Two of this “Catch-Up Miniseries;” the new episode will focus upon the fourth season of the show and will bring our humble podcast to current times, appreciations, and readiness for iZombie coverage going forward and through its announced conclusion following the fifth season.  Like, follow, and/or subscribe to the website, iTunes, YouTube, Stitcher Radio, Google Play, or our social media accounts to stay abreast of new episodes regarding iZombie as well as new episodes for all of our podcast panels!  And, if you feel so inclined, please leave us a review.  Thank you! 🙂

Battle Creek, First Look & Looking Back (MAJOR SPOILERS)

CPU! final-01

A new episode of Couch Potatoes Unite!, which is based on a blog of the same name hosted at couchpotatoesunite.wordpress.com. In this episode, (re)recorded in May 2018, our group of motley Michiganders – moderator Kylie, Spencer, Laurie, and Chad –gathered together Around the Water Cooler to simultaneously take a First Look while Looking Back at canceled buddy cop comedy-drama Battle Creek.  If you have not watched any of Battle Creek, be aware that there are MAJOR SPOILERS.  Tell us what you think in the comments below, and check out the blog and YouTube for other TV related discussions, in both podcast and blog format. Also, if there are other shows you’re interested in the blog covering, sound off below! Tell us what you like or don’t like. Keep the discussion going!

Editor: Kylie C. Piette
Logo: Rebecca Wallace
Marketing Graphic Artist: Krista Pennington

PODCAST! – Pilots, Premieres, and First Looks & Looking Back at “Battle Creek” (MAJOR SPOILERS)

Image result for battle creek cbs title card

Moderator: Chief Couch Potato Kylie

THE SPECS:

Who: “Battle Creek,” a comedy-drama that aired on CBS in 2015.

What: Created by Vince Gilligan and David Shore and starring Josh Duhamel and Dean Winters, the show followed the mismatched partnership of a police detective and a FBI agent in Battle Creek, Michigan.

When: The show aired for one season in 2015 on CBS.

Where: The show is set in Battle Creek, Michigan – present day.

Why: Listen to the podcast for the panelists’ individual stories on how they found Battle Creek.

During the annual Fall TV Preview for the 2014-2015 season, CPU! Chief Kylie picked up this show for CPU!’s review.  When I picked it up, I said:

Though I’m not much for procedural cop shows, this is about a town in Michigan, and that’s where I’m from.  The town itself is about 45 miles from me in Grand Rapids, and it’s the home of cereal brands like Kellogg’s and Post.  So, I’m curious enough to watch it.

How – as in How Was It?

The pilot/premiere rating scale:

***** – I HAVE TO WATCH EVERYTHING.  HOLY SMOKES!

**** – Well, it certainly seems intriguing.  I’m going to keep watching, but I see possible pitfalls in the premise.

*** – I will give it six episodes and see what happens.  There are things I like, and things I don’t.  We’ll see which “things” are allowed to flourish.

** – I will give it three episodes.  Chances are, I’m mainly bored, but there is some intrigue or fascination that could hold it together.  No matter how unlikely.

* – Pass on this one, guys.  It’s a snoozer/not funny/not interesting/not my cup of tea… there are too many options to waste time on this one.

Battle Creek = 3.9, by average of the podcast panel.

SYNOPSIS

FBI Agent Milt Chamberlain (Duhamel) is transferred to Battle Creek from Detroit under mysterious circumstances, where he must work closely with the local police department, particularly hot-headed Detective Russ Agnew (Winters) and his motley band of fellow cops and co-workers, to solve local crimes.  The trouble is, Battle Creek, city of, is strapped for resources; Russ is threatened by the federal money backing Milt’s position, and perhaps by the agent’s easy good looks, while Russ and the rest of the Battle Creek PD must rely on ingenuity, intuition, and nerve to address the varied crimes committed in the “sleepy,” cereal-producing town of Battle Creek.

THOUGHTS

Your Chief CP originally nominated Battle Creek to inaugurate our yet-to-be-inaugurated “Canceled Corner” feature.  Imagine my surprise when not only a frequent CPU! panelist but two brand new panelists eagerly jumped up to chronicle the goings-on of one, low-rated, lowly little season of a show that has some pedigree behind it, even if it had little else, including network backing and support.  Specifically, regular CPU! panelist Spencer, who hangs out most on our comic book adaptation panels as well as the panels covering UK imports (can’t imagine why), and two brand new – and married – panelists, Laurie and Chad, gathered “Around the Water Cooler” to take a “First Look” while “Looking Back” (we’re complicated around here!) at this unceremoniously canceled buddy cop dramedy from 2015.  Though this program came and went somewhat quickly, it clearly made an impression, which the panel wistfully dissects in the episode below.

This podcast was (re)recorded in May 2018, and there are, without question, MAJOR SPOILERS, as we cover major plot points in Battle Creek. Listen at your own risk, and let us know what you think by commenting below!

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter (@cpupodcast), Instagram (@couchpotatoesunite), Pinterest (@cpupodcast), or email us at couchpotatoesunitepodcast@gmail.com – or subscribe to this blog, the YouTube channel, our iTunes channel, our Stitcher Radio channel , and/or find us on Google Play to keep track of brand new episodes.  In the meantime, let us know what you think!  Comment or review us in any of the above forums – we’d love your feedback!

Remember, new episodes and blog posts are published weekly!  Next Wednesday, we launch a new panel “Around the Water Cooler” as some of our most frequent panelists and CW devotees put their brains together, though not as food, to catch up on iZombie, in the first part of a two-part miniseries for just that purpose.  Stay tuned!

RECOMMENDATION
The panel recommends Battle Creek particularly to fans of Dean Winters, who the panel unanimously agreed altogether makes the show; to fans of smaller towns, like the Cereal Capital of the World; and to fans of procedural TV but with a twist.  The panel lauded the effortless chemistry of the two leads, both with each other and with the rest of the ensemble, as well as the show’s somewhat hesitant but mostly successful attempts to tackle large, important social topics and the effects such issues pose to so-called small towns. Several of the panelists also see this program as easily reviewed and watched again.  Some have already done so but, in any event, the show’s aesthetic and winks and nods to the real life Battle Creek give it a potentially timeless charm.  Also, it’s got a great theme song that sounds like “Michigan.”  If you’re from the Mitten, you’ll get it.  Though the show’s only season is self-contained, the ending is rushed, no doubt influenced by the show’s early cancellation, despite its full season order.  The panel, therefore, qualifies its recommendation with caution, as what passes for a conclusion left the panel with a lack of easy satisfaction, which we expect would be a common reaction.
THE FUTURE OF THE SHOW
Canceled!  Battle Creek was canceled after one season, and after only nine episodes had aired, by CBS. Fortunately, and at last check, the one season in question is available to stream on Netflix.  As always, be wary that the ending on this series is messy and somewhat rushed (“half-assed,” as one panelist called it), so while the panel generally recommends the show as above, the panelists do so with caution, given the less than satisfactory ending attached to the final moments of the series.

RERUN! – 13 Reasons Why, Season One (MAJOR SPOILERS)

CPU! final-01

This week: we rerun this episode, originally published in May 2017, to refresh your respective memories concerning Season One of 13 Reasons Why.  In the meantime, we’re preparing to record and to publish our review of the second season, released just this month!  Does the risky and controversial Season Two play out in a satisfying way in the episodes we view?  Stay tuned to find out!

Next week, a brand new panel will be taking a First Look while Looking Back at canceled CBS buddy cop comedy drama, Battle Creek.  Stay tuned!

—Original Synopsis—

A new podcast episode of Couch Potatoes Unite!, which is based on a blog of the same name hosted at couchpotatoesunite.wordpress.com. In this episode, recorded in May 2017, our panel of veteran CPU! panelists and conscientious TV fans – including moderator Kylie, Kristen, Andrew, Amie, Jenn, Emily, and Jeremy – is Around the Water Cooler and discussing Season 1 of runaway hit and Netflix original 13 Reasons Why. If you have not watched any of 13 Reasons Why, be aware that there are MAJOR SPOILERS! Tell us what you think in the comments below and check out the blog and YouTube for other TV related discussions, in both podcast and blog format. Also, if there are other shows you’re interested in the blog covering, sound off below! Tell us what you like or don’t like. Keep the discussion going!

Editor: Kylie C. Piette
Logo: Rebecca Wallace

How to Get Away with Murder: Shark Jumpers Anonymous (MAJOR SPOILERS)

CPU! final-01

A new podcast episode of Couch Potatoes Unite!, which is based on a blog of the same name hosted at couchpotatoesunite.wordpress.com. In this episode, recorded in April and in May 2018, our remaining panel of CPU! enthusiasts who enjoy getting away with murder – Kristen, Krista, and Eddie – continue a new interview-style feature on CPU! entitled “Shark Jumpers’ Anonymous,” in which panelists – and about to be former-panelists – explain why they are making leaps and bounds over predatory fish (or like trees and leaving).  Answering a script of questions, panelists explain why they have stopped watching a particular show – which, in this case, is How to Get Away with Murder.  If you have not watched any of HTGAWM, be aware that there are MAJOR SPOILERS! Tell us what you think in the comments below and check out the blog and YouTube for other TV related discussions, in both podcast and blog format. Also, if there are other shows you’re interested in the blog covering, sound off below! Tell us what you like or don’t like. Keep the discussion going!

Do you want CPU! to continue covering How to Get Away with Murder on the podcast?  If so, volunteer to be a panelist!  We are a podcast by the people for the people, or, for specifically the Couch Potatoes who wish to unite with us.  If you would like to join this panel (and bring a friend, as we need at least two to revive it), message us via Facebook or Twitter, via our website (couchpotatoesunite.wordpress.com), or via email at couchpotatoesunitepodcast@gmail.com.  Where ever you may be in the world, we are able to connect with you – via video conferencing or phone conferencing – or, if you want to submit a written review of the show, send it along!

Editor: Kylie C. Piette
Logo: Rebecca Wallace
Marketing Graphic Artist: Krista Pennington

PODCAST! – Shark Jumpers Anonymous: “How to Get Away with Murder” (MAJOR SPOILERS)

Interviewer: Chief Couch Potato Kylie

THE SPECS:

Who:  “How to Get Away with Murder” is currently on hiatus but is a drama that airs on ABC, fall/winter Thursdays at 10:00 PM.

What: “How to Get Away with Murder,” a drama featuring Viola Davis (The Help) as a law professor at a prestigious Philadelphia university who, along with a select group of an elite five of her students chosen to be interns at her law firm, becomes entwined in a murder plot.

SYNOPSIS

Annalise Keating (Davis) is a prominent criminal defense attorney and a law professor at Middleton University in Philadelphia. She selects five students to intern at her firm: Wes Gibbins (Alfred Enoch, the Harry Potter films), Connor Walsh (Jack Falahee), Michaela Pratt (Aja Naomi King), Asher Millstone (Matt McGorry), and Laurel Castillo (Karla Souza). They work with Annalise’s employees, Frank Delfino (Charlie Weber) and Bonnie Winterbottom (Liza Weil), an associate lawyer.  All players become increasingly involved, peripherally or directly, in the primary murder plot of the season.

When: Season Four aired on ABC from September 28, 2017, to March 15, 2018.

Where: The action is set in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Why: To find out why individual podcast panelists started watching this show, listen to the podcast episode via the link below!

How – as in How Was It? – THOUGHTS

CPU! started reviewing, in podcast format, How to Get Away with Murder from the beginning!  To catch up on prior CPU! episodes or to wrap your ahead around the progress of this Shonda Rimes produced legal thriller to date, cop to our handy links below:

Season One

Season Two
 

Season Three

Unfortunately, coverage of How to Get Away with Murder on the podcast is about to go the way of the dodo.  The remaining panelists – Kristen, Krista, and Eddie – find themselves at a Fonzie-inspired crossroads: an inability and sheer lack of desire to proceed forward in watching this Shondaland mainstay.  As such, though they visited the Water Cooler in the past to talk about a show they once loved, and were even excited enough to rotate moderating duties among them, they now elected to continue a new interview-style feature on CPU! entitled “Shark Jumpers Anonymous,” in which panelists – and about to be former-panelists – explain why they are making leaps and bounds over predatory fish (or like trees and leaving).  Answering a script of questions, the panelists explain why they have stopped watching the show in question, namely HTGAWM.

If you love this show – never fear.  You can join CPU! as a panelist, for this and for other shows.  Scroll down to “Looking Ahead” for the details!

In the meantime, give this latest CPU! episode a listen and see if you agree or disagree with the panel’s spicy thoughts.  The interviews were recorded in April and in May 2018, and there are, without question, MAJOR SPOILERS, as the panelists cover key plot points of all seasons of HTGAWM. Listen at your own risk, and let us know what you think by commenting below!

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter (@cpupodcast), Instagram (@couchpotatoesunite), Pinterest (@cpupodcast), or email us at couchpotatoesunitepodcast@gmail.com – or subscribe to this blog, the YouTube channel, our iTunes channel, our Stitcher Radio channel , and/or find us on Google Play to keep track of brand new episodes.  In the meantime, let us know what you think!  Comment or review us in any of the above forums – we’d love your feedback!

Remember, new episodes and blog posts are published weekly!  Next Wednesday, CPU! takes a First Look while Looking Back at a show that could have been eligible for another new feature in the works (“Canceled Corner”) but which was blessed with a surprising amount of interested panelists willing to talk about it – and to complain that it was canceled three years after the fact.  The show in question is Battle Creek, and the panelists convening at the Water Cooler have some surprisingly passionate opinions.  Stay tuned!

Questions, Impressions, and Future Considerations

Lingering Questions

1) Will Laurel carry her baby to term?  Will we learn more about her father?

ANSWER (from Wikipedia): Laurel deduces that her father, Jorge Castillo, is responsible for Wes’ murder and hatches a scheme to steal incriminating evidence from his law firm with the help of Michaela, Oliver, Frank, and Asher. During the data heist, their classmate, Simon (Behzad Dabu), accidentally shoots himself with Laurel’s gun, leading to Asher’s arrest, and Laurel goes into premature labor after being accidentally struck by Frank. Annalise successfully saves the baby; however, Jorge claims custody of his grandchild by submitting evidence of Laurel’s past addictions and history of mental illness to a judge.

2) Will all of the remaining Keating 5 survive next season?

ANSWER: The Keating Four (minus Wes) live to get away with murder another season.

3) Will the show get better?  Will the show return to its roots?  Or, is it locked into its current style?

ANSWER: In answer to the first question, the panel says, “No!”  In answer to the second question, the panel says, “No!”  In answer to the third question, the panel says, “The style changes so much, we are struggling with the show and jumping the shark.”  More or less.

4) Will we ever see the characters in school again?  Will Connor continue to spiral out of control?

ANSWER: According to panelist Eddie, the characters, if they are seen in school, are only seen in Annalise’s class, which is a particular frustration for him and part of the reason why he was motivated to “jump the shark.” Without watching it, there does not seem to be any indication that Season Four focused particularly on the character of Connor or on his perceived deterioration much.

PARTING SHOTS

The remaining HTGAWM panelists previously rated the third season rather poorly, noting the writing to be unfocused and inconsistent in quality, the pace to be slow to the point of drudgery, and the characters to be making uncharacteristic choices, another symptom of possible writing struggles indicative of declining quality.  As a result, these same three panelists – notably the three who started the panel – previously contemplated “jumping the shark.”  In this episode, they render the contemplation a reality; in fact, one panelist could not bring herself to watch any of the fourth season, while the other two panelists at least gave continuing on with the series the old college try, though all eventually gave up in light of other, higher priority television offerings out there.  In fact, our departing panelists lauded an original storytelling format underlying a remarkable first season that was far superior to any of the seasons that followed, the successful cast performances, and the quality production elements.  Yet, as the panelists also note, the writers failed to deliver a story with some level of consistency, particularly in character development; the directors failed to deliver consistent pacing; and the show took a risk by killing off a major – and well-liked – character without providing a satisfactory set of circumstances and/or explanations for the “bold” choice.  As a result, no panelist is left standing as the show heads into Season 5…unless new panelists, including a new moderator, join.  Care to be one of them?

LOOKING AHEAD

HTGAWM was renewed for a fifth season and is expected to return in fall 2018, though no premiere date has yet been announced.  Because the entire panel “jumped the shark,” CPU! will not return to the Water Cooler to discuss How to Get Away with Murder again….unless…

Dear Viewer/Listener:

Do you want CPU! to continue covering HTGAWM on the podcast?  If so, volunteer to be a panelist!  We are a podcast by the people for the people, or, for specifically the Couch Potatoes who wish to unite with us.  If you would like to join this panel (and bring a couple of friends, as we need at least three panelists to revive it, one of whom must willingly moderate the panel), message us via Facebook or Twitter, via our website (couchpotatoesunite.wordpress.com), or via email at couchpotatoesunitepodcast@gmail.com.  Where ever you may be in the world, we are able to connect with you – via video conferencing or phone conferencing – or, if you want to submit a written review of the show, send it along!  In the meantime, CPU! will maintain surface coverage of goings-on in HTGAWM’s universe, including reporting renewals or cancellations, until the series ends.  Stay tuned!